Jump to topic
Understanding the Scope and Objectives of ISO 42001 and ISO 27001
ISO 42001 and ISO 27001 serve distinct yet complementary purposes within the realm of organisational standards. ISO 42001, poised to be a pioneering standard for AI management systems, aims to establish a comprehensive framework addressing AI governance issues such as security, safety, privacy, fairness, and transparency. Its primary objective is to guide organisations in the responsible development, deployment, and maintenance of AI systems, ensuring these technologies are used ethically and effectively, as outlined in Requirement 4 and Requirement 6.
In contrast, ISO 27001 focuses on information security management systems (ISMS), providing a systematic approach to managing sensitive company information so that it remains secure. It encompasses people, processes, and IT systems by applying a risk management process, thereby helping organisations protect their information assets, which complements the Requirement 8 of ISO 42001.
ISO 42001 extends beyond the traditional security measures of ISO 27001 by introducing AI-specific controls and considerations. While ISO 27001 lays the groundwork for securing information systems, ISO 42001 builds upon this foundation with a focus on the unique risks and ethical considerations associated with AI technologies, as detailed in Annex A Control A.2 and Annex A Control A.10.
Both standards significantly contribute to organisational governance and risk management. ISO 27001 establishes a robust framework for information security, while ISO 42001 offers a forward-looking approach to managing the complexities of AI. Together, they provide a comprehensive governance model that addresses both current and emerging technological risks, ensuring organisations can navigate the evolving landscape of digital and AI-driven innovations, as discussed in Annex D.
Integration and Compatibility Between ISO 42001 and ISO 27001
Integrating ISO 42001 with existing ISO 27001 Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) frameworks offers organisations a comprehensive approach to managing both information security and AI governance. This integration is facilitated by the alignment of ISO 42001 with ISO 27001, 27701, and 9001, enhancing existing management systems by incorporating AI-specific considerations.
Benefits of Harmonising ISO 42001 with ISO 27001, ISO 27701, and ISO 9001
Harmonising these standards provides several benefits, including a unified approach to governance, risk management, and compliance (GRC) that addresses both information security and AI-specific risks. It ensures consistency in managing security (Requirement 3.23), privacy (Requirement 3.7), fairness, and transparency across all organisational processes. Additionally, this integration supports regulatory compliance and fosters trust among stakeholders by demonstrating a commitment to ethical AI practices (Requirement 4.1, 4.2).
Challenges in Aligning ISO 42001’s AI-Specific Controls with ISO 27001
Aligning ISO 42001’s AI-specific controls with ISO 27001 presents challenges, primarily due to the unique nature of AI risks and the need for specialised controls to address them. Organisations must carefully assess their existing ISMS to identify gaps and incorporate AI governance measures without compromising the integrity of their information security practices (Requirement 5.3, Requirement 5.5, Annex A, Annex B).
How ISMS.online Facilitates Integration for Compliance Officers
At ISMS.online, we understand the complexities involved in integrating ISO 42001 and ISO 27001. Our platform provides compliance officers with tools and resources to streamline this process. We offer templates, guidance, and support for implementing AI-specific controls within the existing ISMS framework, ensuring a seamless integration that enhances organisational governance and risk management capabilities (Requirement 7.5, Annex A.10, B.10.2, B.10.3, B.10.4).
Get an 81% headstart
We've done the hard work for you, giving you an 81% Headstart from the moment you log on.
All you have to do is fill in the blanks.
Risk Management Approaches in ISO 42001 vs. ISO 27001
ISO 42001 introduces a risk management framework specifically designed to address the unique challenges and risks associated with artificial intelligence (AI). This framework is tailored to ensure that AI systems are developed, deployed, and maintained in a manner that prioritises security, privacy, fairness, and transparency, as outlined in Requirement 6.1. In contrast, ISO 27001 focuses on establishing a comprehensive information security management system (ISMS) that safeguards information assets against various threats, not specifically tailored to AI.
Key Differences Between Risk Management Strategies
The primary distinction between the risk management strategies of ISO 42001 and ISO 27001 lies in their focus areas. ISO 42001’s risk management framework is explicitly designed to mitigate AI-specific risks, such as biassed decision-making, lack of transparency in AI algorithms, and potential misuse of AI technologies, as detailed in Requirement 5.3 and Annex A Control A.5.4. Meanwhile, ISO 27001 adopts a broader approach to risk management, concentrating on securing information assets from a wide range of threats without specific emphasis on AI.
AI-Specific Risk Considerations
ISO 42001’s risk management strategy includes a focus on AI-specific considerations such as data quality (Annex B.7.4), ensuring fairness (Annex C.2.5), and enhancing transparency and explainability (Annex C.2.11). These considerations are critical for addressing the nuanced risks that AI systems may introduce.
Alignment with NIST AI RMF
ISO 42001’s approach to AI risk management aligns closely with the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (RMF). Both frameworks advocate for a systematic, risk-based approach to managing AI-related risks, emphasising the importance of governance, accountability, and continuous improvement in AI systems’ lifecycle, as supported by Requirement 5.2, Annex C.2.1, and Annex C.2.2. The general use of the AI management system across domains is also in alignment with NIST AI RMF principles, as noted in Annex D.1.
Systematic Approach to AI Risk Management
Organisations are encouraged to adopt a systematic approach to AI risk management, integrating governance and accountability mechanisms throughout the AI system’s lifecycle. This approach is essential for ensuring that AI systems are developed and used responsibly.
Tailoring ISO 42001 Features to Enhance ISMS under ISO 27001
Organisations can leverage the specific features of ISO 42001 to enhance their existing ISMS under ISO 27001. By integrating AI-specific risk management practices from ISO 42001 into their ISMS, organisations can address the evolving landscape of AI risks more effectively. This integration allows for a more robust governance structure that accommodates the rapid advancements in AI technologies while maintaining a strong foundation in information security management, as facilitated by Requirement 4.4, Annex A Control A.5.5, and Annex B.5.5. The integration of the AI management system with other management system standards, such as ISO 27001, is further elaborated in Annex D.2.
Enhancing Information Security with AI Considerations
Integrating AI-specific risk management practices into an organisation’s ISMS ensures that the unique risks associated with AI technologies are adequately addressed, enhancing the overall security posture and resilience of the organisation’s information systems.
Certification Processes for ISO 42001 and ISO 27001
Navigating the certification processes for ISO 42001 and ISO 27001 involves a series of structured steps, beginning with a comprehensive gap analysis, as per Requirement 4.1, to identify areas of improvement within your organisation’s current management systems. This is followed by the implementation of necessary controls and processes to meet the specific requirements of each standard, including the establishment of the AI management system’s scope as per Requirement 4.3. Internal audits, as required by Requirement 9.2, are then conducted to ensure compliance, leading up to the external audit by an accredited certification body. Throughout this process, maintaining documented information as required by Requirement 7.5 is essential for demonstrating compliance.
Impact of ISO 42001 Audibility by 2024
The anticipated audibility of ISO 42001 by 2024 marks a significant milestone for organisations seeking to certify their AI management systems. This development not only facilitates formal recognition of compliance with AI governance standards but also enhances trust among stakeholders, as outlined in Requirement 4.2, and supports adherence to regulatory requirements such as the EU AI Act. The increased focus on AI system impact assessments, as outlined in Requirement 5.6, will be critical in evaluating the potential consequences of AI systems on individuals and society.
Role of Regulatory Compliance in Certification
Regulatory compliance, including adherence to the EU AI Act, plays a required role in the certification process for both ISO 42001 and ISO 27001. Ensuring compliance with these regulations not only mitigates legal and financial risks but also aligns with ethical standards and public expectations regarding AI and information security. Addressing regulatory compliance as part of the risk treatment process, as described in Requirement 5.5, is essential for the effective management of AI-related risks.
Support from ISMS.online
At ISMS.online, we are committed to supporting organisations in their journey towards certification for both ISO 42001 and ISO 27001. Our platform offers a suite of tools and resources designed to simplify the compliance process, from gap analysis to internal audits. Our expert guidance ensures that you’re well-prepared for the certification audits, facilitating a smoother path to achieving and maintaining compliance with these critical standards. By providing the necessary resources (Requirement 7.1) and ensuring personnel competence (Requirement 7.2), ISMS.online is an invaluable partner in your certification endeavours.
Compliance doesn't have to be complicated.
We've done the hard work for you, giving you an 81% Headstart from the moment you log on.
All you have to do is fill in the blanks.
Compliance Tools and Strategies for ISO 42001 and ISO 27001
Achieving compliance with Requirement 1 and ISO/IEC 27001 necessitates a strategic approach, leveraging both specialised tools and comprehensive strategies.
Strategies for Ensuring Adherence
Compliance officers should employ a multidisciplinary approach, integrating risk management (Requirement 6.1), cybersecurity (A.9.4), and AI ethics into their compliance strategies. Regular training and awareness programmes (Requirement 7.2 and Requirement 7.3) are essential to keep staff informed about the latest compliance requirements and best practices.
How ISMS.online Helps
ISMS.online supports organisations in managing compliance with both Requirement 4 and ISO/IEC 27001, offering a suite of tools designed to streamline the compliance process, from documentation management (Requirement 7.5) to audit preparation (Requirement 9.2). By leveraging ISMS.online, you’re equipped with the resources necessary to achieve and maintain compliance efficiently, ensuring that your organisation’s information security and AI governance meet the highest standards. This comprehensive solution aligns with Requirement 5 for leadership and Requirement 9 for performance evaluation, as well as Annex D, which discusses the integration of AI management systems with other management system standards.
Organisational Implications of Adopting ISO 42001
Adopting ISO 42001 significantly impacts organisational roles, policy, and structure, especially when contrasted with ISO 27001. While ISO 27001 centres on information security management, ISO 42001 broadens the scope to include the governance of artificial intelligence (AI), necessitating a wider array of considerations for an organisation.
Impact on Organisational Roles, Policy, and Structure
ISO 42001 necessitates a nuanced approach to organisational roles, mandating specific responsibilities related to AI governance, such as ethical AI use and AI risk management, as per Requirement 5.1. This standard compels organisations to re-evaluate their policies and structures to integrate AI-specific considerations, ensuring AI technologies are developed, deployed, and managed with responsibility and transparency, aligning with Requirement 5.2 and Requirement 5.3. Additionally, the establishment of AI roles and responsibilities is essential, as outlined in A.3.2 and further detailed in B.3.2.
Considerations for Human Resources and Asset Management
Under ISO 42001, human resources and asset management practices must adapt to meet the unique challenges posed by AI. This includes creating specialised training programmes for staff involved in AI projects, as highlighted in Requirement 7.2, and implementing robust asset management strategies to safeguard AI-related intellectual property and data, in accordance with Requirement 7.5. The development of AI expertise, as mentioned in C.2.2, is also critical, necessitating a focus on human resources, as per A.4.6 and B.4.6.
Addressing Supplier Relationships Differently
ISO 42001 emphasises managing supplier relationships with a focus on AI ethics and compliance. Organisations are encouraged to establish clear criteria for AI procurement, emphasising transparency, fairness, and security, as per Requirement 8.1. This is further supported by the need to manage suppliers effectively, as stated in A.10.3 and B.10.3.
Leveraging ISO 42001 for Enhanced Governance and Ethical AI Use
Organisations can utilise ISO 42001 to fortify their governance frameworks and advocate for ethical AI use. By incorporating AI governance into their overall management systems, organisations can ensure AI technologies are utilised in a manner that aligns with ethical standards, regulatory requirements, and societal expectations, thereby bolstering trust and credibility among stakeholders. This integration is supported by Requirement 4.1, Requirement 4.2, and Requirement 4.4. The assessment of societal impacts of AI systems, as per A.5.5 and B.5.5, along with the accountability and transparency in AI systems, as discussed in C.2.1 and C.2.11, are essential. The integration of the AI management system with other management system standards is facilitated by D.2.
Manage all your compliance in one place
ISMS.online supports over 100 standards
and regulations, giving you a single
platform for all your compliance needs.
Global Scope and Cross-Industry Application of ISO 42001
ISO 42001, with its global scope and cross-industry applicability, is specifically tailored to address the governance of artificial intelligence (AI), distinguishing itself from ISO 27001, which focuses on information security across various sectors. ISO 42001 ensures that AI technologies are developed, deployed, and managed with an emphasis on security, privacy, fairness, and transparency, extending its reach beyond the traditional scope of information security.
Unique AI Risks Addressed by ISO 42001
Designed to mitigate unique AI risks prevalent across different industries, such as algorithmic bias, lack of transparency in decision-making processes, and potential misuse of AI technologies, ISO 42001 addresses these risks which, if not properly managed, can have significant ethical, legal, and reputational implications for organisations. The standard emphasises the need for organisations to consider the issues referred to in Requirement 4 and the requirements referred to in Requirement 4.2 to determine the risks and opportunities that need to be addressed.
Specifically, Annex A Control A.5.4 and Annex B.5.4 provide guidance for assessing and documenting the potential impacts of AI systems on individuals or groups of individuals throughout the system’s life cycle, while Annex C.3.4 identifies the quality of data used for machine learning as a source of risk.
Catering to Diverse Organisational Needs
Both ISO 42001 and ISO 27001 are adaptable to the specific needs of organisations of various sizes and sectors. However, ISO 42001 provides a more focused framework for organisations that utilise AI technologies, offering guidance on implementing AI governance practices that align with ethical standards and regulatory requirements. This adaptability is supported by Annex D.2, which discusses how ISO 42001 can be integrated with other management systems, such as ISO 27001, to cater to diverse organisational needs.
Demonstrating Broad Applicability
The broad applicability of ISO 42001 is demonstrated through its use in healthcare for managing AI-driven diagnostic tools, in finance for AI-based fraud detection systems, and in automotive for the development of autonomous vehicles. These examples underscore the standard’s versatility in addressing security, privacy, fairness, and transparency concerns in AI applications across diverse industries. The applicability of the AI management system across various domains and sectors is outlined in Annex D.1, while Annex D.2 highlights the use of ISO 42001 in conjunction with sector-specific standards to address the unique challenges of different industries.
Further Reading
The Importance of ISO 42001
ISO/IEC 42001 emerges as a pivotal standard for organisations navigating the complexities of artificial intelligence (AI) governance, serving as a critical framework for balancing the innovative potential of AI technologies with robust governance structures. This balance, essential for fostering an environment where innovation thrives while adhering to ethical, legal, and societal standards, is guided by Requirement 4.1 and Requirement 5.2, ensuring that AI policies are established and compatible with the strategic direction of the organisation.
Future Outlooks for Mastering AI Management
The future outlook for mastering AI management through ISO/IEC 42001 is promising. As organisations increasingly rely on AI technologies, the standard provides a comprehensive blueprint for managing AI systems effectively, addressing emerging risks as per Requirement 5.3, ensuring compliance with evolving regulations, and fostering an ethical AI ecosystem, supported by Requirement 9.1 and the importance of assessing the maturity of AI technologies as highlighted in C.3.7.
Using ISO/IEC 42001 for Competitive Advantage and Economic Growth
Organisations can leverage ISO/IEC 42001 to gain a competitive advantage and drive economic growth. By demonstrating commitment to ethical AI governance and risk management, as outlined in Requirement 5.1 and understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties as per Requirement 4.2, organisations can build trust with stakeholders, including customers, regulators, and partners. This trust, coupled with the innovative capabilities of AI, positions organisations to capitalise on new opportunities and navigate the challenges of the digital age effectively.
Addressing Unique AI Risks Through ISO 42001
ISO 42001 identifies a range of unique AI risks, including algorithmic bias, lack of transparency, and potential misuse of AI technologies. These risks are addressed through tailored annex controls that provide organisations with specific guidelines to mitigate such challenges effectively. The standard emphasises the need for organisations to consider the issues referred to in Requirement 4.1 and the requirements referred to in Requirement 4.2 to determine the risks and opportunities that need to be addressed to ensure the AI management system can achieve its intended result(s).
Organisations are encouraged to provide capabilities for interested parties to report adverse impacts of the AI system, aligning with addressing the unique risks such as algorithmic bias and potential misuse as outlined in Annex A Control A.8.3. The implementation guidance suggests that AI policies should be aligned with other organisational policies, which can help address the lack of transparency in AI decision-making processes as per Annex B.2.3. This annex highlights the risk source related to the lack of transparency and explainability, which ISO 42001 seeks to mitigate through its controls and guidance, particularly noted in Annex C.3.2.
Tailored Annex Controls in ISO 42001
The tailored annex controls in ISO 42001 cater to organisational needs by offering a structured approach to managing AI risks. These controls emphasise ethical AI use, transparency in AI decision-making processes, and the implementation of robust governance frameworks to ensure AI technologies are used responsibly. The controls under Annex A Control A.5 provide a structured approach for organisations to assess the impacts of AI systems on individuals and societies, emphasising ethical AI use.
The implementation guidance for this control provides a framework for establishing a process to assess the potential consequences for individuals or groups of individuals, or both, and societies that can result from the AI system throughout its life cycle, as detailed in Annex B.5.2.
Challenges in Integrating ISO 42001 with Existing Frameworks
Compliance officers face challenges in integrating ISO 42001 with existing frameworks, primarily due to the novel nature of AI risks and the need for specialised knowledge to address them. Overcoming these challenges requires a comprehensive understanding of both AI technologies and the specific requirements of ISO 42001. This annex provides guidance on integrating the AI management system with other management system standards, acknowledging the challenges in merging novel AI risk management with existing frameworks as per Annex D.2.
Promoting Ethical AI and Risk Management
ISO 42001 promotes ethical AI and risk management within organisations by establishing clear guidelines for the development, deployment, and maintenance of AI systems. By adhering to these guidelines, organisations can ensure that their use of AI aligns with ethical standards, regulatory requirements, and societal expectations, thereby enhancing trust and credibility among stakeholders.
This objective focuses on ensuring that AI systems are developed and used fairly, without bias, and in a manner that aligns with ethical standards and societal expectations as highlighted in Annex C.2.5. The importance of transparency and the ability to explain AI decisions, which is necessary for maintaining stakeholder trust and credibility, is underlined in Annex C.2.11.
Benefits of Implementing ISO 42001 Alongside ISO 27001
Implementing ISO 42001 in conjunction with ISO 27001 offers a comprehensive framework that enhances an organisation’s ability to manage both information security and artificial intelligence (AI) governance. This integrated approach ensures a robust management system that addresses the unique challenges and opportunities presented by AI technologies, while also maintaining a strong foundation in information security management.
Enhancing Organisational Integration, Global Alignment, and Regulatory Compliance
By adopting ISO 42001 alongside ISO 27001, organisations can achieve greater integration of their management systems, ensuring that AI governance is seamlessly incorporated into their overall information security strategy. This harmonisation facilitates global alignment with international standards and best practices, enhancing the organisation’s reputation and trustworthiness. Furthermore, it supports compliance with a wide range of regulatory requirements, including those specific to AI technologies.
- The integration of AI governance with information security strategy aligns with Requirement 4.4, establishing an AI management system that is part of the organisation’s business processes.
- The harmonisation with international standards and regulatory compliance is supported by Requirement 5.2, the establishment of an AI policy that includes a commitment to meet applicable requirements.
- The adoption of ISO 42001 alongside ISO 27001 exemplifies the integration of AI management systems with other management system standards, promoting a unified approach to governance as outlined in Annex D.2.
Advantages of a Systematic, Multidisciplinary Approach
A systematic, multidisciplinary approach to implementing these standards allows organisations to leverage diverse expertise across their teams, ensuring that all aspects of AI governance and information security are addressed comprehensively. This approach fosters collaboration and innovation, enabling organisations to navigate the complexities of AI technologies effectively.
- The multidisciplinary approach aligns with Requirement 7, determining and providing the necessary resources, competence, and awareness to support the AI management system.
- The comprehensive address of AI governance and information security reflects the potential organisational objectives and risk sources outlined in Annex C, which organisations should consider when managing risks.
How ISMS.online Can Aid Organisations
At ISMS.online, we provide a platform that simplifies the process of implementing and managing ISO 42001 and ISO 27001. Our tools and resources support organisations in developing a cohesive strategy that aligns with both standards, facilitating documentation, compliance management, and continuous improvement. By leveraging ISMS.online, you can maximise the benefits of ISO 42001 and ISO 27001, ensuring that your organisation remains at the forefront of information security and AI governance.
- ISMS.online provides a platform that aligns with the implementation guidance for AI controls, offering tools and resources to support organisations in developing and managing their AI management system as per Annex B.
- The platform aids in the implementation of Annex A controls, providing a structured approach to managing AI-related risks and opportunities.
- ISMS.online supports performance evaluation by providing tools for monitoring, measurement, analysis, and evaluation, which are essential for continuous improvement in alignment with Requirement 9.
Other ISO AI Standards and Their Relationship with ISO 42001
ISO 42001, focusing on AI management systems, is complemented by a suite of other ISO standards that collectively enhance the governance, development, and deployment of AI technologies. These standards interact with ISO 42001 to provide a comprehensive framework for managing AI risks and leveraging AI opportunities.
Complementary ISO AI Standards
Several ISO standards support the objectives of ISO 42001, including those related to terminology, machine learning (ML) frameworks, and risk management. For instance, ISO/IEC 23894 provides guidance on AI risk management, aligning closely with ISO 42001’s Requirement 2 on systematic risk assessment and mitigation. Similarly, standards like ISO/IEC 23053, which focuses on frameworks and approaches for AI systems, offer foundational support for the implementation of ISO 42001.
- Requirement 2 aligns with the requirement that references other documents which constitute requirements of ISO 42001.
- Annex C aligns with the mention of ISO/IEC 23894 and its guidance on AI risk management.
- Annex D aligns with the reference to ISO/IEC 23053 and its focus on frameworks for AI systems.
Importance in the Regulatory Landscape
ISO 42001 stands as a voluntary standard that wields significant influence in shaping the regulatory landscape of AI governance. Its adoption can serve as a benchmark for regulatory compliance, demonstrating an organisation’s commitment to ethical AI practices. This standard plays a necessary role in establishing trust among stakeholders and facilitating regulatory benchmarking, thereby enhancing the credibility and accountability of AI systems.
- Requirement 1 reflects the scope of ISO 42001, emphasising its role in establishing trust and facilitating regulatory benchmarking.
- Annex D aligns with the influence of ISO 42001 in the regulatory landscape and its role as a benchmark for compliance.
Enhancing Stakeholder Trust and Regulatory Benchmarking
The integration of ISO 42001 with other complementary ISO AI standards strengthens stakeholder trust by ensuring that AI technologies are governed according to internationally recognised best practices. This harmonisation supports regulatory benchmarking, enabling organisations to navigate the complex regulatory environment of AI more effectively.
By adhering to these standards, organisations can demonstrate their dedication to responsible AI governance, thereby fostering trust and confidence among users, regulators, and the broader community.
- Requirement 4.2 aligns with the requirement to understand and manage the needs and expectations of interested parties, which is essential for enhancing stakeholder trust.
- Annex A supports the commitment to best practices and regulatory benchmarking by implementing the control objectives and controls listed.
- Annex B provides guidance for implementing AI controls, supporting the harmonisation of AI management practices with international standards.
- Annex C aligns with the focus on fostering trust and confidence among stakeholders related to accountability, transparency, and ethical AI practices.
Contact Us for Guidance on ISO 42001 and ISO 27001
Navigating the complexities of Requirement 1 and ISO/IEC 27001 can be challenging, but at ISMS.online, we’re here to assist your organisation every step of the way. Our platform is designed to simplify the integration of AI management systems with existing Information Security Management Systems (ISMS), ensuring a seamless transition towards compliance with both standards.
How ISMS.online Can Assist Your Organisation
Our platform offers comprehensive support for integrating AI management systems with existing ISMS frameworks. We provide tools, templates, and guidance to help you align your organisation’s practices with the requirements of Requirement 4.1, Requirement 4.2, and ISO/IEC 27001, facilitating a cohesive approach to managing both information security and AI governance.
- Requirement 4.4: ISMS.online provides a structured approach to establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving an AI management system, directly supporting A.4.4 and B.4.4 guidance on system and computing resources.
- Requirement 5: The platform supports the establishment of AI policies and the assignment of roles, responsibilities, and authorities, aligning with the leadership and commitment requirements of Requirement 5, A.3.2, and B.3.2.
- Requirement 6: ISMS.online aids in planning actions to address risks and opportunities, ensuring the AI management system can achieve its intended outcomes, in line with C.2.5 on fairness and B.5.3 guidance on objectives for responsible development of AI systems.
- Requirement 7: The platform offers resources for maintaining documented information required by the AI management system, consistent with A.7.4 on data quality for AI systems and B.7.4 guidance on ensuring data quality.
- Requirement 8: ISMS.online assists in operational planning and control, enabling the implementation of AI risk treatment plans and the monitoring of control effectiveness, as advised by A.8.4 on communication of incidents and B.8.4 guidance on incident communication plans.
- Requirement 9: The platform provides features for monitoring, measurement, analysis, and evaluation of the AI management system’s performance, supporting A.9.4 on intended use of the AI system and B.9.4 guidance on ensuring AI systems are used as intended.
- Requirement 10: ISMS.online supports the management of nonconformities and corrective actions, promoting continual improvement, aligning with A.10.3 on suppliers and B.10.3 guidance on establishing processes with suppliers.
Streamlining the Certification Process
Contacting ISMS.online ensures a streamlined process for achieving and maintaining certification. Our platform's intuitive design and comprehensive resources reduce the complexity of compliance, allowing you to focus on enhancing your organisation's security and AI governance practices. Let us help you navigate the certification landscape efficiently, ensuring your organisation meets the highest standards of information security and AI management.- C.2.10: ISMS.online's Security Management module addresses AI-specific security concerns, supporting organisations in meeting the security objectives outlined in C.2.10.
- D.2: The platform's integration capabilities enable organisations to align their AI management system with other management systems, promoting a holistic approach to governance, risk, and compliance across various domains and sectors, as exemplified by D.1 guidance on sector-specific applications.
